Naturopathic Medicine & Homeopathy Articles

Sun, 04/03/2011 - 23:01

As the profile of Naturopathic Medicine in North America has been on the rise in recent years, I have increasingly been contacted by prospective Naturopathic Medical students who are interested frank feedback on my education and career as a Naturopathic Doctor in Vancouver & Port Coquitlam, British Columbia.


In fact, just this week, I received emails from three different individuals who, despite hailing each from different continents, all posed near-identical reiterations of this basic question. 


When synchronicity blugeons me on the head like this, I can't help but take notice. :)


So, without further adieu, here are some of the advantages and disadvantages of pursuing a Naturopathic Medical career in the Greater Vancouver region of BC.


Lets start with some pros.


In short, my experience as a naturopath in the GVRD has been very rewarding thus far. 


I mean that primarily in an emotional and spiritual sense, although this profession can no doubt be financially lucrative. In fact, I work with a senior naturopath who apparently grosses upwards of half-a-million annually.


That said, my income is quite a bit more modest.


Of course, the value of doing something for which you have a passion cannot be underestimated, and certainly cannot be properly in mere dollars and cents. 


On the other hand, there have naturally been downsides as well. 


For instance, after completing my undergraduate Systems Engineering degree, I was fortunate enough to be accepted to both naturopathic (ND) and conventional allopathic (MD) medical schools. 


While that doesn't sound like much of a downside, you'll see what I'm getting at soon! :) 


I chose the former because, after having just left the cold, analytical world of engineering, I was careful to avoid thrusting myself back into another rigidly-mechanistic and numbingly-clinical program. 


The scope of education at the Boucher Institute of Naturopathic Medicine was certainly well-rounded enough to allow for training in somewhat non-clinical or alternative disciplines, such as electrotherapy and exercise rehabilitation training. 


Additionally, the inclusion of the naturopathic core treatment disciplines: 

  1. Homeopathy
  2. Botanical Medicine (Herbalism)
  3. Traditional Oriental Medicine (TOM / TCM)
  4. Therapeutic Nutrition
  5. Psychological Counseling (including that of patients and their loved ones in near-death cases, or even through the death process, and cognitive behavioral therapy), and 
  6. Physical Medicine (Naturopathic Physical Manipulation, similar to chiropractic, as well as Massage, Hydrotherapy, UV light, and ultrasound therapies)

gave me a plethora of useful skills that I still regularly use in my daily practice.


Nonetheless, as most graduates of the six fully-accredited Naturopathic Medical Schools: 

  1. Boucher Institute of Naturopathic Medicine
  2. Bastyr University
  3. Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine
  4. National College of Natural Medicine
  5. Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine
  6. University of Bridgeport College of Naturopathic Medicine

would no doubt attest to, there's no shortage of clinical work involved in getting the ND degree! 


With extensive training in conventional clinical and biomedical sciences, such as:
     • Anatomy
     • Biomedicine, which includes:
           • Biochemistry
           • Lab Diagnosis
           • Pathology
           • Pharmacology
           • Physiology
     • Clinical Biochemical Connections
     • Diagnostic Imaging
     • Differential Diagnosis
     • Microbiology I - II
     • Neuroanatomy
     • Oncology
     • Physical Clinical Diagnosis
as well as an additional post-graduate phamaceutical therapy course, I along with many of my collegues have attained sufficient training to prescribe all but the most restricted pharmaceuticals along MDs. 


However, note that this does not imply that I choose to prescribe pharmaceuticals on a daily or even monthly basis.


Instead, as eloquently stated by Dr. Christoph Kind, ND, the president of the British Columbia Naturopathic Association (BCNA),

“In a sense, the ability to prescribe legitimizes the decision not to prescribe"

So, despite their seeming differences, there are a great many similarities between the depth, direction and focus of study in naturopathic and conventional (allopathic) medical schools alike.


This chart highlights the similarities between accredited ND and MD education - as well as the striking differences between the fully-
accredited ND programs administered by the aforementioned six schools (the leftmost two columns in the chart) and the non-accredited "ND" knockoff degrees issued in non-regulated states (the rightmost two columns).


As for my experience in my early years of practice, there were again some positives and some negatives. 


One of the positives was that, by the completion of my ND degree, I had received a plethora of clinical training - 
over 2000 hours devoted specifically to seeing patients and making real-life treatment decisions - via the Boucher student clinic and intership.


This naturally helped to create a relatively smooth transition into the working world. 


In fact, the interships I had completed presented me with job opportunities at multiple clinics on graduation. 


As a result, I was able to begin part-time work between preparations for my week-long board exams, and this transitioned nicely into full-time work immediately thereafter.


On the other hand, due to the relatively low profile of NDs in North America today, as well as the degree of competition in Vancouver and, to a lesser extent, Port Coquitlam, I could not simply put out my shingle and magnetically begin attracting patients. 


Admittedly, this magnetic force has become increasingly stronger in recent years.


However, I reason that has more to do with the positive word-of-mouth being spread by some of my wonderful patients than the modest increase in either Naturopathic Medicine's public image or the general demand for NDs in the GVRD, particularly in the 
heavily-saturated Vancouver city proper


However, going back to the beginning of my career, I certainly could not then rely on word of mouth.


Instead, I was forced instead to wear the dual hats of physician and entrepreneur, and to manage the health of my business in tandem with that of my patients.


Despite having been well-trained for this businessman role, it was one I once long resisted, idealistically (and very stubbornly) shunning self-promotion in favour of intensive focus on patient care - which, after all, was what I became a doctor to do!


But at the end of the day, if one chooses to take the road less traveled, it's only natural that one must learn to blaze a trail.


And once that path has been cleared, the possible destinations to which it may be followed are limited only by a Naturopathic Doctor's drive, passion and imagination. 


Take care,
Andy

___________________________________________
Dr. Andy Somody, B.Eng, C.B.H.T., C.C.H., N.D.
   Naturopathic Doctor
   Certified Bowen Therapist
   Certified Classical Homeopath
___________________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sat, 06/19/2010 - 05:07

If I told you that you can get the same relief from your pain with either:

 

a). an invasive, potentially fatal surgery, or 

b). a risk-free sham procedure,

which would you pick? 

 

That's the question being prompted by the results of a multi-center, double blind, placebo controlled trial, entitled "A Randomized Trial of Vertebroplasty for Painful Osteoporotic Spinal Fractures", and published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2009.

 

This study compared the efficacy of vertebroplasty - a common surgical procedure involving the injection of bone cement into fractured vertebra - to a sham procedure.

 

The result? 

 

In all outcomes measured - overall pain, pain at night, pain at rest, physical functioning, quality of life, and perceived improvement - there was no significant difference between the two groups at any time following the intervention.

 

Does this mean vertebroplasty is ineffective in relieving pain? 

 

Not at all - it's very effective!

 

After all, there were significant improvements in all of the measured outcomes at each of the scheduled follow-ups.

 

But the improvements in the placebo group were just as great

 

In fact, the only statistically significant difference between the two groups at all - the total QUALEFFO score at 1 week - favored the placebo group

 

This, for me, is another beautiful affirmation of a common theme that is seen throughout many, if not all, aspects of medicine.


While at first blush this idea that we docs don't really know what we're doing or why our therapies are helping may appear unsettling, I actually find the prevalence of the so-called "placebo effect" to be quite liberating. 

After all, it implies that the ultimate power to heal ourselves lies within each of us - something that I have been increasingly convinced of throughout my time in practice, and which I wholeheartedly utilize with my patients.

Most patients do possess this capacity for self-healing within themselves, and simply need the proper healing trigger from a well-chosen external source of information. 

While I clearly believe that the homeopathic remedy is one of the best such triggers (if you don't know what I'm talking about, look at ... well, pretty much anything else on this site! :) ), a surgical intervention - or mock surgical intervention, as it turns out - can be just as healing. 

 

That is - provided it's matched to the patient who needs it.

 

IMHO, all forms of medicine have at least some potential for healing inherent within them. 

 

The only question which remains is WHICH medicine will be most healing for THIS given patient

 

This is the place where individualization must occur, and where we doctors (IMHO) must set aside our alleged "expertise", and realize that no cookbook protocol can offer the same deeply curative results as a well-matched individualized prescription.


But, if this is true, why is it that the patients in this study improved?

 

After all, how could they have been well-matched? This was a multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial, a form of evidence which - in evidence-based medicine circles - is considered to be of higher quality than any other! 

 

But do the subjects in the study really represent a random cross-section of people with osteoporotic spine fractures?

 

After all, by self-selection, only those who were willing to undergo the invasive vertebral injection would have signed up for this study in the first place!

 

This suggests that the patients in the study were those who, on some level, found the idea of this invasive treatment to beat least tolerable, if not somewhat appealing.

 

Thus, IMHO, these study subjects instinctively selected for themselves the treatment that, of all their alternatives, was the most well-matched to them!

 

Individualization at its finest :)

 

Interestingly, I also find that this is true in my practice.

 

I can't count the number of times that I have just discovered a way to treat a certain, very specific condition ... and, for the next few days, I'll be barraged by people with just that condition needing just that treatment!

 

A strange phenomenon, indeed, and one which I had a tendency to dismiss "short-term memory bias" in the past - until I experienced it so often that I could no longer deny there was something greater going on.

 

As has been my experience with homeopathy and energetic medicine in general - when I experience something again and again, no matter how inexplicable it may superficially seem, I cannot help but to simply know a deeper truth must lie somewhere therein.

 

This, IMHO, is the highest form of evidence available.


It is more than evidence - it is simply evident

 

It is the kind of truth that you don't need a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to confirm.


And this is the level at which I prefer to work with my patients. 


Although I have nothing against testing, and believe it to be valuable in supporting diagnosis and treatment decisions, I'm not fixated on what your test results suggest that you should or must be suffering from - after all, if you have Fibromyalgia or IBS, this is apparently is nothing!.


No, I'm more interested in what is your actual experience


Your completely subjective, completely unobservable experience. For you, this is truth. 


And your own personal truth is, IMHO, to be respected even more highly than the most well-designed placebo-controlled study


This is the key to deeply individualized treatment. Which is the key to permanent cure.  Which is the key to health. 


In health,

 

Dr. Andy Somody, B.Eng, C.B.H.T., C.C.H., N.D.

Thu, 04/08/2010 - 04:23
Homeopathic Dosage Guidelines
Introduction to the 7-part series
 
I was inspired to this series of articles by a recent extended email dialog I had with a patient. 

This patient not only asked me to answer several detailed questions around the specifics of homeopathic dosing / posology, but also indicated specifically that they wished me to answer by email, rather than by phone or in person, such that they could save my responses for future reference.

As I typed on and evening faded into morning (sigh ... :) ) , I ended up asking a few questions of my own: 
  1. What if all my patients have similar questions that go unasked? 
  2. Why not present all of this in a public forum for everyone's future reference!
Without further adieu, here are the links!
Thu, 04/08/2010 - 03:04

Homeopathic Dosing & Posology:

Post #7 in a 7-part series

7) Is it OK or recommended to take ____________ with the remedy?

If ______________ is a suppressive medication - which basically means anything with the prefix anti - or if you notice yourself having any discernible response to it another food, drug, environment, emotional influence, etc. (essentially ___________ could be anything!), please consider the following. 

The only situation I hypothesize in which it would be an OK idea to take a suppressive medication is where the healing process has been stimulated to occur, but is occurring way, way too fast, producing a great aggravation. As mentioned above, however, I rarely see aggravations at all in my practice, and those which I do see are so minor and short-lived as to not cause the patient any real distress, and certainly not enough to be worth worrying about. 

That said, I do not advise any patients to come off of anything - especially not prescription drugs that have been prescribed by another doctor. However, I often find that a truly good remedy is able to act through pretty much any suppression (albeit potentially more slowly) and that, after a while on this remedy, the patient themselves decides they feel such improvement as to wean themselves off the drugs (of course, with the consent of their doctor and the aid of a professional).....
Thu, 04/08/2010 - 02:45

Homeopathic Dosing & Posology:

Post #6 in a 7-part series

6) How long should I wait in between dosages?


Like everything previously discussed, this is also individualized. 

In general, the more acute and severe something isthe more frequent the doses can be without producing an aggravation, and the higher the potency the remedy can be (potency being another subtlety I haven't really discussed, one which may actually never be important in your case, but something I'll touch on in the future if it becomes necessary to change potencies)....